I love seeing bands at small venues, but somehow the three events I have in my calendar for the rest of the year (so far) are all massive gigs:
- 21 June: Taylor Swift at the Ziggo Dome in Amsterdam. (Vicki at work put “Shake It Off” into the New Music Monday playlist last year; I discovered Red; Fiona discovered that I liked Taylor Swift; promises were made about seeing her if she ever came to town; tickets were bought. Fiona + Abi + me + maybe a friend of Fiona’s. Alex: “NOPE”)
- 23 June: Foo Fighters at Murrayfield in Edinburgh. (After watching Sonic Highways I really wanted to see them live. I got an after-market ticket for the pitch, because a hospitality package didn’t seem very rock and roll. Note to self: it’s a Tuesday. Remember to ask for that afternoon off work.)
- 19 October: Imagine Dragons at the Forum in Copenhagen. (This is one Alex does want to see. Alex and Fiona are both fans, but we missed them on their last tour. This time round I tried to get tickets for Brussels, but they literally sold out as I was clicking through to buy them. Fortunately Copenhagen is still within reach for us, and the gig is on the Monday of the kids’ autumn school holiday. A fine opportunity to spend a few days in a new city!)
Last Saturday evening Fiona, Abi, and I went to the Arena to see Jupiter Ascending . Forget the negative criticism – it’s a more than decent sci-fi action romp. Some of the editing is rough, and it felt like there were bits of storyline missing, or cobbled together from spare footage. But it’s such a glorious world, inhabited by lushly bonkers characters that I didn’t mind at all.
The world of the story feels so much bigger than what you see on screen. For example, when Jupiter is being shepherded through the inheritance process by an android, and being thwarted by bureaucracy at every opportunity. There’s a rich background of fashion, class, and mores embedded in the scene where the two androids face off, but it doesn’t get used anywhere else in the film. I think it would be worth watching again to see what else I missed.
I found it interesting how the film echoed one of the questions posed by the Wachowskis in The Matrix: why are we here? In both films humanity was put here (our modern world that might not be the real world) for a reason. In both cases the answer, when revealed, is grim and scary. But Jupiter and Neo make completely different decisions about which world they are willing to fight for, and return to.
Also: fantastic special effects and simply amazing chase scenes. This is a film to love, if you’re willing to give it a chance.
Fiona and I had planned to go to see Insurgent at the weekend as well, but some live music got in the way on Sunday afternoon. We went on Monday evening instead. It was okay; not as strong as Divergent. It’s a bridge to the end of the trilogy.
Taking my own advice about watching more romantic comedies instead of dark and violent thrillers, I watched The Brothers Bloom on my flight across to Edinburgh this week, and Chef on the way back. Loved both of them. I was thoroughly imnpressed by Rian Johnson’s first film Brick, and also by Looper a couple of years ago, but Bloom managed to pass me by. Which is curious, because it’s exactly the kind of con-man/heist-y flick that I like. It’s a sweet film, with lots of Edgar Wright-ish visual touches.
Chef is downright adorable. Jon Favreau is brilliant in all his roles, as writer, director, and lead. Throughout the film I kept expecting the plot to take turns for the worse, so that our protagonist could sink deeper into trouble before bravely fighting his way back, but it’s not like that. In the scenes where you think something bad is going to happen, it turns out okay, because people are quite nice. It may be unrealistic, but it’s full of heart without being schmaltzy. It’s about people doing what they love, finding their passions, and being okay with who they are. I came off the plane smiling WHICH IS RARE.
Comics: I finished the last two volumes of Ex Machina. It’s offers a clean ending to the story, but the way it wraps up the parallel-dimension storyline felt abrupt. There had been hints leading up to this point, and of course it’s the big pay-off to the whole question of “who and why?” that underlies the series, but it just felt hasty to me. Now that I have all ten volumes, I think I’ll have to go back and re-read them in a single stretch. That may change my mind.
On my way to Waverley Station on Friday afternoon I stopped in at Forbidden Planet on North Bridge and picked up volume 1 of Trees by Warren Ellis and Jason Howard. I don’t remember where I heard about it, but it sounded intriguing. It is. I’ll be looking forward to the next volume.
The low-FODMAP diet is working out very well for me. After using lactose-free milk for a couple of months, I got the notion to try an entirely dairy-free alternative: coconut milk. (I tried soy milk a few years ago, and vowed never to let it pass my lips again.)
Technically, I don’t think this is really coconut milk, but more “coconut milk drink”. Sure, it’s made with coconut, but it’s also fortified with rice and a variety of other substances. The first time I tried it, it threw me completely off-balance with a question I’d never considered before: “what are the essential qualities of milk that make me want to drink it?” Is it the mouthfeel? The flavour? What is the flavour of (cold) milk?
That led to other disconcerting questions like, why do we put milk on our breakfast cereals? What is about milk that transforms a bowl of muesli? It was a very confusing time in my life.
So anyway, the substance itself: it has about the same viscocity as milk. It has a very similar, silky mouthfeel, with a fresh coconutty flavour over a milky (milkish?) base. It tastes like milk flavoured with coconut. As a standalone beverage, it is actually quite pleasant.
(White Russians with coconut milk?)
But pour it into a glass, and it looks…wrong. It’s too white. When you swirl it around the glass, it doesn’t cling to the glass in the same way that milk would – it doesn’t have the right “legs”. Your hand hesitates ever so slightly as you move to pick up the glass. It’s in the Uncanny Valley of Milk.
(It also doesn’t go off after two weeks in the fridge.)
(Memories of watching non-Dutchies react after pouring themselves a glass of karnemelk by accident, thinking it was ordinary milk.)
So I ate it with my cereal for a couple of weeks. At first, coconut-flavoured rice krispies and corn flakes were an amusing novelty. But the fun wore off pretty quickly. Although the coconut flavour wasn’t overpowering, it provided more excitement than I was typically ready to deal with early in the morning.
(Can you cook with it? Abi doesn’t want to consider it for her coffee, but how would it do as the basis for Tuna Pasta? Would it add an exotic note, like in a Thai curry? Could you use it to make a white sauce?)
I’ve gone back to plain old semi-skimmed lactose-free milk with my breakfast now. Sweet, familiar, milk.
(So what is that flavour of milk?)
At very short notice I got tickets for Glen Phillips and Paul Freeman. It was an afternoon gig, and I thought Fiona might find it fun, so I invited her along as well. (Alex: “NOPE”) Abi came along, too.
We drove to NDSM, but couldn’t get parked quickly enough, so we missed the ferry we’d planned to take to Centraal Station. There was another one ready to leave for the Tasmanstraat, and we took it instead. The Botel has some big new letters up on its roof.
We walked from the Tasmanstraat along the Haarlemmerdijk to the Spuistraat (amazingly, I think that’s the first time I’ve ever been along the Haarlemmerdijk), and then took a tram to the Leidseplein. I had never been to the Sugarfactory before. It’s a cute little club venue just across the street from Melkweg. For a laid-back, folk-y afternoon show, there were small tables and chairs on the floor in front of the stage. I guess there were around a hundred people there. We got something to drink, and tucked ourselves away near the stairs in the back right corner.
First Paul Freeman came on for half an hour, then Glen Phillips did half an hour. Then after a break they both came on stage, and traded songs for another hour or so before finishing with a once-rehearsed duet of the Traveling Wilburys “Handle With Care”. It was a sweet, relaxed, neat little gig.
In truth, Medium’s main product is not a publishing platform, but the promotion of a publishing platform. This promotion brings readers and writers onto the site. This, in turn, generates the usage data that’s valuable to advertisers. Boiled down, Medium is simply marketing in the service of more marketing. It is not a “place for ideas.” It is a place for advertisers. It is, therefore, utterly superfluous.
“But what about all the writing on Medium?” The measure of superfluity is not the writing on Medium. Rather, it’s what Medium adds to the writing. Recall the question from above: how does Medium improve the Internet? I haven’t seen a single story on Medium that couldn’t exist equally well elsewhere. Nor evidence that Medium’s editing and publishing tools are a manifest improvement over what you can do with other tools.
In sum—still superfluous.