Meeting a fellow blogger

While we were in the Netherlands last week, we spent an afternoon in Amsterdam. Abi and Alex went on a boat trip, and I met up with Frank Schaap of Fragment.nl fame. I know people who have started blogs since I’ve known them, but Frank is the first person I’ve met in person after getting to know him on-line first.

We ate pancakes, walked around the city for a while, and had a great chat about blogging, games, on-line life, and Dutch culture. I took a photo to mark the occasion. Believe it or not, the signs in the background were actually a complete coincidence.

Martin Sutherland and Frank Schaap

High School Reunion, part 1

It was my high school reunion last week. Wow. It wasn’t a reunion specifically for my year, but rather a party for the whole school, which is now 90 years old. Several thousand former pupils and teachers showed up for the evening, and the entire school was packed out with people going, “Great to see you! So what are you doing now?”

I was having a lot of mixed feelings about going back. First of all, I’m not a very social person. Given the choice between going out to a party, or staying home and reading a book, I’ll take the book almost every time. I have an odd condition called “obscure auditory dysfunction,” which means that despite having perfect hearing under normal conditions, I have some difficulty making out speech in noisy environments. I could be charitable and say that this is what makes me uncomfortable in party situations, because I can’t hear half of what people are saying to me. Generally, though, I figure that I’m just a crotchety bastard who doesn’t like people.

Also, until the end of last year, I had completely lost touch with everyone from my class. This was all my fault. A Christmas card each year, and a postcard or two to communicate address changes is hardly a great effort, but it was still too much for me. Re-establishing contact with someone means admitting that you lost contact in the first place. In the grand scheme of things, it’s a tiny embarrassment. But after a certain amount of time had gone by, I found it easier to live with the personal guilt of losing touch, than to deal with the interpersonal shame of admitting my incompetence as a correspondent.

I left school in 1989, and I lost touch with my last set of school friends (Marco Linden and Ineke Linden-Brümmer) in about 1996. (All my fault. I didn’t follow up on an address change, and now Marco and Ineke are somewhere in Africa, practicing tropical medicine…I think. If anyone knows where they are, please drop me a line.) For a few years after that, I would have found it too awkward and socially painful to contemplate a reunion, if one had taken place.

But time is a damp sponge that wipes many slates clean. After a certain amount of time, I found myself wanting to find people again, and to reconnect to my friends from back then. I started doing web searches to see who I could find. In November of last year I came across Evert-Jan, who was in touch with several others from our old gang, and so the first set of links was established. In June of this year I found an email address for Olga, who has been a friend since primary school, and who was instrumental in bringing Abi and me together. (A story for another occasion, perhaps.) Olga was in touch with a different knot of contacts, and we joined the two chains together. By the time the reunion came around, we had about twenty classmates on the list.

Next in the list of sources for mixed feelings, there’s the problem of language. My old school is in the Netherlands, you see. I grew up there. I was six years old when we moved to Voerendaal; my brother Scott was four. We both attended Dutch primary schools, and we picked up the language very quickly. We only spoke English at home, and Scott and I even started speaking Dutch with each other. We still do. Although we spoke and read English at home, we both learned “formal” English (grammar, etc.) as a foreign language at a Dutch high school. In many ways, Dutch is our first language.

Or at least, it was.

After finishing high school in 1989, I moved to St. Andrews to go to university. I went back to see my parents in the Netherlands during the holidays, but less frequently as the years progressed. Scott also moved back to Scotland, and went to Stirling to study psychology. Abi and I got married in 1993, and we set up house in Edinburgh. My parents moved back to Scotland in 1995. With all of my family back here, and having lost contact with almost all of my school friends, I have very little reason to go back to the Netherlands on a regular basis.

Consequently, my Dutch suffered. Enormously.

I can still understand spoken Dutch easily enough–that was never a problem. Because Scott and I still speak Dutch to each other (although by now it’s more of a personalized English/Dutch creole), I have retained a certain amount of fluency in speaking the language. I still have a Limburgs accent, for example. I’ve lost a lot of idiom, though. When speaking with Scott, if I can’t think of a Dutch phrase quickly enough, I’ll throw in the English version, rather than waiting or asking him if he knows the right expression.

Written Dutch is a different matter altogether, though. I can still read Dutch perfectly well, just much more slowly than I used to. Written language generally uses more complex grammatical constructions than spoken language does. Sentences are longer, and people are inclined to use longer and rarer words than the ones that roll happily off the tongue in free-flowing everyday speech. I have to concentrate to read Dutch newspapers. (Weblogs are an interesting cross between formal written language and informal conversations, and I’ve been reading a couple regularly to try and increase my reading fluency.)

As for writing Dutch…. Aargh. Now that’s really difficult. When I was getting back in touch with all of these friends through email, it took a lot of time and effort to construct even the most basic paragraphs in reasonably grammatically correct, simple Dutch. A few times I had to revert to English just so I could finish an email in a single evening.

Forgetting a language you once knew very well (I was editor of our school magazine, for goodness’ sake) is strange, and more than just a little scary. There was a point last weekend where I went into a bakery to buy some pastries for a late breakfast. The bakery shelves were filled with delicious sweet things I recognized from my childhood. But I could not remember what any of them were called. The price list behind the counter showed the names of all the pastries: hanekammen, nonnevotten, moorkoppen, and lots more. But the words were meaningless to me. Even with the items themselves right in front of me, I couldn’t make the mental connection between the pastries and their names.

I suddenly had a glimpse of what it must be like to be suffering from dementia, or to have some other form of brain damage. It chilled me.

All of this, then: the reluctance to socialize, the embarrassment of having lost contact, and the awkwardness of not being able to speak the language properly; they all contributed to make me feel uneasy and uncertain about going to the reunion.

The last major factor is change, or at least the fear of change. How much would people have changed? Would we still have anything to talk about? Would we still have anything in common, apart from our memories of school? Would we even still recognize each other?

My fear was partly allayed, and partly exacerbated by our visit to the Netherlands a month previously, at the end of August. On the one hand, while we were driving around Voerendaal and Heerlen (the nearby town where the school is located), I was so freaked out by some of the changes that I had to stop and let my dad take over the driving. What are those houses doing there? Where did the road go? There’s a shopping centre there? Where are we? Help!

On the other hand, Abi, Alex and I took some time out to go and visit Olga and her husband Hans. I was nervous before seeing her, but the visit was wonderful, and very reassuring. Apart from being pregnant, and looking a bit narrower in the face (and more like her mother), Olga hasn’t changed much. Hans is a wonderful, friendly guy, who was more than happy to play with Alex, and to speak English with Abi. We didn’t pick up our friendship from exactly where we left it ten years ago, but that would have been even weirder. Instead, we talked as adults, as fellow parents and parents-to-be, and as ready-made acquaintances.

If you don’t cultivate them, the bonds of friendship undoubtedly grow weaker with time. Shared history never disappears, but the experiences belong to the people we were then. To us, they are memories. Friendship can be rooted in the past, but it has to live in the present. Its bonds therefore have to reflect the people we are now. That’s probably the thing I feared most: have my old friends and I changed so much that we could no longer become new friends?

Personality tests

After seeing it on Charlie Stross’s diary, I just did an on-line Myers-Briggs personality test. The results?

ISFP

ISFP – “Artist”. Interested in the fine arts. Expression primarily through action or art form. The senses are keener than in other types. 5% of the total population.

Take Free Myers-Briggs Personality Test

Artist? I’m an artist? The last M-B test I did was back at teacher training college. I don’t remember what personality type I came out as back then, but I’m damn sure it wasn’t “Artist”. Have I changed so much since then?

I’m generally disinclined to put much stock in personality tests. I’m happy enough to spend a few minutes filling in the answers to silly questions to find out what science fiction/fantasy character I am. (Boromir, hmph; at least I go out in a blaze of glory.) But it’s painfully easy to second-guess the questions and subvert the results to reflect your own deluded self-image. If you think they’re anything more revealing than, say, your star sign, then that in itself says more about you than the average test does.

(Myers-Briggs tests can be an exception. M-B personality typing is a well-understood field, and properly administered tests try to take personal bias into account. Most on-line versions aren’t properly administered, but some do make an attempt to minimize the influence of ego (or should that be the id?) by asking the same question in different ways.)

I’d be far more interested in seeing a site that allowed other people to answer questions about you. Now that would be revealing.

When I joined the Royal Bank of Scotland as a trainee in 1996, a group of us got sent to Barfil Farm (and Management Centre) in Dumfriesshire for a team-building course with the excellent Bob Lee. After three days of seminars, role-playing exercises, intensive team-working, and a certain amount of alcohol, we had a round-table session where each of us had to evaluate someone else. We were given a sheet of paper with a bundle of adjectives on it, and we had to circle the ones we thought were most appropriate to our subject.

Now, I don’t even remember which of my other fellow trainees I had to report on, let alone what I said about them. I also don’t remember any of the positive things that were said about me. But here are are three adjectives that will forever be etched in my memory: distant, ruthless, and patronising.

They resonated with me because I dislike those traits in other people. I didn’t (and don’t) want to be like that myself, but that was how someone perceived me. Someone who was not close enough to be a friend (and therefore wary of hurting my feelings), yet not so unfamiliar that they had no idea who I really was (because of the three days of working closely together). Basically, someone who had enough information to form a decent, relatively objective opinion.

Having that external perspective allows me to do something about it. Knowing what I want to avoid, I can (try to) modify my actions and behaviour. In comparison, virtually any on-line test you take will try to massage any negative traits into admirable strengths. You may be a cold-blooded serial killer, but at you’re also methodical, tidy, and have a strongly developed sense of natural justice. Hum.

Don’t expect to develop self-knowledge in isolation, or through self-administered personality tests. At heart, everyone thinks they’re pretty decent. To see the whole picture, you have to seek out your reflection in the mirror of other people. On the one hand, this can be a gift:

“O wad some Pow’r the giftie gie us
To see oursels as others see us!
It wad frae monie a blunder free us,
     An’ foolish notion:
What airs in dress an’ gait wad lea’e us,
     And ev’n Devotion!

Robert Burns – To A Louse

On the other hand, chances are you won’t like what you see. Jean-Paul Sartre, ever the optimist, put it succinctly: “L’enfer, c’est les autres.” Hell is other people. Being told that you don’t actually match up to your own image of perfection and virtue is both painful, and immensely valuable.

There are all sorts of lessons here about pride and humility, applicable to fields ranging from writers workshops to international politics. But I’ll leave you to think about them for yourself.

A 400g Toblerone day

You know those days when you just have to eat an entire 400g bar of Toblerone chocolate triangles? I’ve been having a lot of those lately.

Fortunately for my waistline, I haven’t been giving in to the temptation. Today was an exception, though. After several weeks of searching, this morning I accepted a nice job offer, and gave notice of resignation to my current employer. If that’s not worthy of some chocolate gluttony, I don’t know what is.

Bayesian filter for blog comments

I don’t get much comments spam myself right now (maybe a message a week or so), but the problem is definitely getting worse.

For Movable Type installations, there are several solutions available, such as an option to provide a “delete this comment” link with every “new comment” email, and a combined url blocker/comments hider technique. Also, some people have proposed collaborative blacklists, or collaborative authentication for comments posters.

I’m surprised that no-one seems to have suggested Bayesian filtering for comments, though. I get about 15-20 spam messages via email every day, but the SpamBayes plugin for Outlook routes almost all of them straight into a “Spam” folder. I never see them in my inbox. Maybe one or two message in a hundred make it through the filter, and I haven’t had any false positives for ages. It doesn’t involve maintaining blacklists, and it’s a lot less effort than deleting every single junk message.

In Movable Type, it you could have a “bayesfilter” property on the MTComments template tag: <MTComments bayesfilter="1">. All comments would have to pass through the filter, and only those that were not spam would make it on to the page.

You’d need some additional mechanism to “train” the system, and somewhere to put the statistical knowledge base the filter uses to tell spam from genuine comments. Finally, you’d need a way of correcting the system after the initial training, so that any spam that does make it through can be deleted with prejudice, and so that false positives can be corrected.

This would be a nice anti-spam comments system. It would involve a Movable Type plugin, and some hacking to the Movable Type application itself. Unfortunately I don’t have time to do this right now, and even if I did have time, I’ve sworn off perl. (Did you know that “perl” is an anagram of “pain”?) But I wonder if the Lazyweb could do it for me, or if the nice people at Six Apart would be so kind as to include this feature in MT Pro?