Cows

“Dad, what are cows made of?”

“Beef, milk, and leather.”

Not that Alex is asking questions of such complexity yet, but I need to start practicing.

The Plumed Horse

Abi and I were down at the Plumed Horse restaurant in Crossmichael yesterday, for a last short break before the new baby arrives (due in less than two weeks now). It’s a pity that our favourite restaurant in the whole of Scotland is about two hours’ drive away, but oh! the food!

The Plumed Horse dark chocolate souffle with apricot sorbetI started with a smoked haddock and spinach quiche, with a roast scallop, and lemon dressing. My main course was fish again: fillet of brill, with crab mashed potatoes, a shrimp and scallop fishcake, and shellfish sauce. For dessert Abi and I both had the dark chocolate soufflé with apricot sorbet. The horse’s head emblem in the plate is actually a stencilled dusting of cocoa–a lovely little touch.

Abi and Martin at the Plumed Horse in Saratoga, November 2000The souffl&eacute reminded us of the other Plumed Horse restaurant, the one in Saratoga, California, where we enjoyed a fabulous meal at the end of 2000. We had dark chocolate soufflé for dessert then, too, with a dark chocolate sauce to go over it. Abi was pregnant with Alex at the time, though not quite as far advanced as she is now. And just as on our trips to the Scottish Plumed Horse, it was a two hour drive away, only then it was from Oakland down into the South Bay. We had Abi’s parents with us then, and Mick and Sarah, who had managed to stash young Thomas somewhere for the evening.

It’s an odd coincidence that the two Plumed Horse restaurants are located just where they are, and that they have become so closely associated with family, and particularly baby events. It means that it’s not just our stomachs, but also our hearts that keep drawing us back there.

New Toys

As of this afternoon, I’m the happy owner of a new Motorola v525 phone. I haven’t had much time to play with it yet, but the colour screen is nice, the built-in camera is nice, the polyphonic ringtones (with the option to install my own MP3 to play) are nice, the user interface (which I’d been warned was complicated) is nice, the battery life is very nice, and the overall size and feel of the phone in my hand is, well, nice.

I haven’t actually called anyone on it yet, so I don’t know what it’s going to be like in actual use, but I’m sure that will be nice, too.

Also, from early next week, we’ll also be owners of a new Fiat Punto. Whether we’ll be happy owners remains to be seen. We’ve resisted having a car for so long that it’s going to be very odd having one again. With a new baby (forthcoming) and a toddler, it’s going to be undeniably useful, and with me making the move into IT contracting (more on that soon), it will increase the range in which I can operate. But we’ll have to constantly remind ourselves that it’s easier to walk, or cycle, or take the bus for many journeys in and around town.

(But on the other hand, it’s a new toy. Toys are cool. The new car is shiny, and it’s black. It has a CD player, and adjustable lumbar support in the driver and passenger seats. Groovy.)

“You see, the trouble is, I’m not actually American…”

Regarding the whole issue of the USA subjecting us shifty-looking foreigners to ritual humiliation and suspicion before allowing us entry into the “land of the free” (tee-hee!), here’s a nice little article (via Burnt Toast):

Put it this way, if you were hustled away at an English airport, fingerprinted, photographed, interrogated, bullied, harassed, and slapped in handcuffs for complaining, then told that you shouldn’t mind because it’s for the safety of your allies, the English people, because one of you Americans might conceivably be a bomber, you wouldn’t like it, would you? No, so I’m not quite clear why you think doing this to people coming into your country is not going to damage your tourist and travel industry at all. Oh, of course, silly me, because we’re protecting the American people, aren’t we?

That’s the whole problem with this ludicrous measure: it is grossly asymmetrical. US citizens are not required to pass through this catch-all security dragnet, and the US state department cries “foul!” whenever another country reciprocates. Are US citizens somehow magically exempt from being terrorists? Of course not, otherwise why would the federal government be making underhanded grabs for more yet more powers of Fatherland investigation and surveillance? So why not make all Americans give up their fingerprints at border checkpoints? Oh, might that be an invasion of privacy? Morally repugnant? Unconstitutional?

The article makes another point later on (emphasis is mine):

“Yours used to be a fine country, Mr Government Affairs Spokesman; I liked the straightforward way most people went about their business, and the ‘how can we make things work for you’ attitude. It was invigorating and I got a real buzz out of visiting. Now I’m not so sure I want to come and visit. I can stay at home and experience administrative paranoia; I don’t need to see that your country can do it bigger and better than anyone else. I feel uncomfortable trying to deal with an administration that feels so threatened, without being able to define what that threat really is, that it has to tell itself bigger, ever more bizarre stories about perceived threats in order to justify its reactions to what are now effectively pieces of fluff moving in the breeze. This is not healthy. The USA is no longer a healthy country, and this is clearly demonstrated in the way it deals with the rest of the world. 9/11 was a terrible thing, in and of itself, but so was bombing Afghanistan and Iraq because your administration thought the perpetrators might be hiding there, even though it had few grounds for thinking so, and even fewer now that weapons of mass destruction are providing elusive.”

I have been thinking this for some time now. The USA is sick. On the world stage, its behaviour is that of a paranoid schizophrenic. No, really. Take a typical description of paranoid schizophrenia from a typical mental health web site:

[Victims] often begin to hear, see, or feel things that aren’t really there (hallucinations) or become convinced of things that simply aren’t true (delusions). In the paranoid form of this disorder, they develop delusions of persecution or personal grandeur.

Yes, 9/11 was a single, enormous terrorist attack, but that does not mean the whole world has it in for the US. There’s a difference between taking all reasonable security measures, and outright paranoia. There’s a difference between hunting down the perpetrators of an atrocity, and killing thousands of people in the process of invading two countries and wildly lashing out at one’s closest allies. The whole “if you’re not with us, you’re against us” attitude speaks volumes.

But it’s more than just America’s recent performance on the world stage. Take a look at the obscene and ever-widening gap between rich and poor. Take a look at the medical system that soaks up 50% of the world’s healthcare budget, yet leaves 15% of the population out in the cold. Take a look at the hijacking of its political machinery by corporate interests. We’re talking more than just a few social injustices here–we’re looking at an accelerating breakdown in the entire social fabric of the country, and what is the best headline its Leader can come up with to usher in the new year? A moon base. Wow. That’s really going to make people feel good about themselves when their job is off-shored, and they find themselves without medical insurance.

America, the rest of the world looks upon you with a mixture of horror and fear. And part of your problem is that you don’t see that this is a problem. As we all know from pop psychology, acknowledging that you have a problem is the first step towards solving it. So can you please get rid of Bush this year? Thanks. The world will be a safer and nicer place for it.

More evidence of Tribune’s dodginess

More hilarious antics from those wacky characters who used to run Tribune Risk and Insurance Services (from The Scotsman):

“A SENIOR director of Tribune Risk & Insurance was convicted of falsifying insurance documents just seven months before joining the board of the collapsed Midlothian insurer.

“According to court papers obtained by The Scotsman, Jack Walker was fined £1,500 by Edinburgh Sheriff Court in March 2000 for misrepresenting insurance quotations through his brokerage firm Danahy Walker.

“Although Tribune was set up by Walker’s wife Evelyn, he became a director of the company in October 2000. By the time the liquidators arrived at the company’s Eskbank headquarters, he was running the company.”

That’s interesting. When I joined the company, I was given the impression that Jack Walker had started the company himself. Evelyn Walker was still on the company books as an employee, but her importance to the business appeared minimal. Before Tribune’s web site was taken down, it had the following to say about Jack Walker’s history in the industry:

“Tribune was established in 1998 to meet the needs of intermediaries like IFAs, Mortgage Brokers and Solicitors. […]

“Tribune’s Managing Director Jack Walker has over 30 years of experience in the insurance industry as do many other members of the team including Sarah Kelly, Steve Dixon and Alan Watkins, Tribune’s Senior Account Managers. This experience is matched by Tribune’s development of new technologies and systems to drive forward customer service and ease of use for intermediaries.”

No mention of company founder Evelyn Walker. How odd! One could be forgiven for thinking that her stake of the company was merely a front for shady dealings, such as deceiving 40,000 insurance policy holders and about a hundred employees. Surely not! That would be terrible!