{"id":5670,"date":"2025-09-21T21:23:19","date_gmt":"2025-09-21T19:23:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/?p=5670"},"modified":"2025-09-21T21:23:19","modified_gmt":"2025-09-21T19:23:19","slug":"literature-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/2025\/09\/21\/literature-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Literature review"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/improbable.com\/ig\/winners\/#ig2025\">2025 Ig Nobel awards<\/a> have just been announced. Someone at work had posted a link to the winner in the Physics category, which is a study of the <a href=\"https:\/\/pubs.aip.org\/aip\/pof\/article\/37\/4\/044122\/3345324\/Phase-behavior-of-Cacio-e-Pepe-sauce\">clumping properties of <em>Cacio e Pepe<\/em> sauce<\/a>, and I read the original source article. Apart from the physics involved, and the recipe suggestions, what struck me was how very <em>readable<\/em> the article is. The introduction and literature review is particularly to the point. As someone who knows a <em>bit<\/em> about cooking and the science involved, it does a nice job of setting the scene, and situating the current research in an up-to-date body of knowledge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It reminded me of a recent article by Catherine E. De Vries: <a href=\"https:\/\/catherineeunicedevries.substack.com\/p\/most-literature-reviews-miss-the\">&#8220;Most Literature Reviews Miss the Point. Don\u2019t Let Yours&#8221;<\/a> (I&#8217;m afraid I don&#8217;t remember where I came across the article for a &#8220;via&#8221; link.) When doing my psychology diploma, I always found literature reviews both hard to <em>read<\/em> and to <em>write<\/em>. I understood that they had to be there, but I didn&#8217;t understand at a gut level <em>why<\/em>.<em> <\/em>A good literature review (like the one above) is a joy to read, though, and can sometimes provide the reader with more insight than the main paper itself. De Vries writes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>Too often, the literature review is treated as a box to tick before \u201creal\u201d writing begins. I think that\u2019s a mistake. A literature review isn\u2019t the background, it\u2019s our orientation. It shows where we stand and why our next step matters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The entrepreneur Steve Jobs once said: \u201cYou can\u2019t connect the dots looking forward, you can only connect them looking backward.\u201d A literature review is exactly that. We trace ideas backward, not out of nostalgia, but because doing so reveals the logic of where others have been, and what still needs to be built. We begin to see which things repeat, which evidence holds, and which questions remain unanswered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Our question becomes less a leap of faith, and more an inevitable next step. We don\u2019t invent it. We see it, emerging from the structure we\u2019ve laid bare.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>I think I kinda get it now!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The 2025 Ig Nobel awards have just been announced. Someone at work had posted a link to the winner in the Physics category, which is a study of the clumping properties of Cacio e Pepe sauce, and I read the original source article. Apart from the physics involved, and the recipe suggestions, what struck me &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/2025\/09\/21\/literature-review\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Literature review&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[1972,1971,1884,1973,1882,1970,1952],"class_list":["post-5670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-ig-nobel","tag-physics","tag-psychology","tag-research","tag-science","tag-scientific-literature","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5670"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5670\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5671,"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5670\/revisions\/5671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sunpig.com\/martin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}